{"id":18378,"date":"2024-04-23T14:16:35","date_gmt":"2024-04-23T13:16:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dubawa.org\/dir\/?p=18378"},"modified":"2024-04-23T14:16:39","modified_gmt":"2024-04-23T13:16:39","slug":"claim-45-of-kaduna-states-debt-borrowed-before-el-rufais-administration-inaccurate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dubawa.org\/dir\/claim-45-of-kaduna-states-debt-borrowed-before-el-rufais-administration-inaccurate\/","title":{"rendered":"Claim 45% of Kaduna state\u2019s debt borrowed before El-Rufai\u2019s administration, inaccurate"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Claim: An X<\/a> user claimed that 45 per cent of Kaduna State\u2019s debt was borrowed before Governor Nasir El-Rufai was elected in 2015.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Verdict: The claim is false. Data from the Debt Management Office<\/a> (DMO) showed that 80.8% of the Kaduna State’s domestic debt was borrowed under El-Rufai. The state\u2019s domestic debt rose from N16.68 billion in 2014 to N87.2 billion in June 2023. External debt rose from $226.3 million to $569.3 million under El-Rufai\u2019s administration, thus 58.8%\u00a0 of the state\u2019s external debt.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Full Text<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Nigeria\u2019s current debt profile has been a major concern<\/a> for the government and its citizens. The country relies on crude oil sales for government revenue to fund critical infrastructures as well as pay salaries.\u00a0The reduction<\/a> in oil production from crude<\/a> oil theft and the importation of refined oil products have limited what the government earns from the product.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The consequent borrowing from international and local institutions by the federal and state governments to fulfil their responsibilities to the citizenry has brought challenges as the government uses<\/a> a large chunk of finances to pay debt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the government continues to pay its debt with the revenue it is generating, it is left with a quagmire regarding how to pay its workers and fund projects key to the welfare of its people.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This concern was the reason Uba Sani, Governor of Kaduna State, lamented his administration’s inability to pay workers’ salaries during a town hall meeting<\/a> on March 30, 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

He blamed it on the huge debts inherited from his predecessor, Nasir El-Rufai. He stated that the state has a huge debt burden of $587 million, N85 billion and 115 contractual liabilities from his predecessor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The governor’s comment stirred debate on X<\/a>. It pitted him, Uba Sani, against the supporters of El-Rufai, who viewed his complaint as betrayal<\/a>.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It was in the midst of the debate that (@IU_Wakilii) Imran Wakili<\/a> tweeted:\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cTo Uba Sani and his new friends. Firstly, before I start, I would like to point out that 45% of the debt in question wasn\u2019t acquired by the El-Rufai administration, as you are trying so hard to make it look.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Secondly, your administration is not creative at all, sir. Your administration doesn\u2019t have a plan on how to boost IGR or create wealth for Kaduna State. Lagos is the most indebted state in Nigeria, but because they create wealth, you don\u2019t see them complaining about debt.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cIf you continued on the same trajectory as Mallam Nasir El-Rufai, Kaduna would’ve been generating almost 10 billion naira monthly by now, and you wouldn\u2019t be complaining about debt. But, sir, your administration is too focused on politics and impressing political stakeholders; that’s why you can\u2019t do anything,\u201d he added<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

DUBAWA decided to investigate this claim because of its potential to misinform.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Verification <\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

A check on the website of Nigeria\u2019s Debt Management Office showed that Kaduna state\u2019s domestic debt<\/a> was N16.6 billion in 2014, a year before El-Rufai was elected. Still, it rose<\/a> to N87.2 billion as of June 2023, a month after he left.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Also, the state\u2019s external deb<\/a>t was $234.4 million in 2014 but rose<\/a> to $569.3 million in June 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Analysing the Debt Management Office\u2019s debt data, $234.4 million was deducted from $569.3 million. It gave the answer as $334.9<\/a> million, the sum borrowed under El-Rufai. Another calculation<\/a> showed that $334.9 million makes up 58.8 per cent of the state’s debt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Calculations showed that the domestic borrowing debt under El-Rufai was N70.5 billion, which makes up 80.8 per cent<\/a> of the state’s debt. This is because the debt was\u00a0 N16.6 billion in 2014, a year before El-Rufai was elected, and it rose to N87.2 billion when he left.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Analysis showed that domestic debt was 423% while external debt rose by 159%.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Expert Opinion<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

A financial expert and senior partner at SPM Professionals, Paul Alaje, said the primary reason Kaduna State\u2019s debt profile bludgeoned under El-Rufai was the $350 <\/strong>million <\/strong>World Bank loan he borrowed in 2019 for infrastructure development.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe loan, which was first rejected by the senate, led to controversy due to the huge amount. I believe he also replicated this in the domestic borrowings because there was a time he spoke in the news that his predecessor will take over N85 billion debt from him.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On whether interest rate could influence the high rise of debt under El-Rufai, he said: \u201cYes, it is possible, but he would have paid a substantial amount of it since his tenure saw an improved collection of Internal Generated Revenue (IGR). So I don\u2019t think the interest rate affected the State\u2019s debt to accrue to the N87 billion he left,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The claim that 45 per cent of Kaduna State debt was borrowed before El-Rufai was elected is false.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This report is produced for the DUBAWA 2024 Kwame Karikari Fact-Checking Fellowship in partnership with Daily Trust Newspaper to facilitate the ethos of truth in journalism and enhance media literacy in Nigeria.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Claim: An X user claimed that 45 per cent of Kaduna State\u2019s debt was borrowed before Governor Nasir El-Rufai was elected in 2015. Verdict: The claim is false. Data from the Debt Management Office (DMO) showed that 80.8% of the Kaduna State’s domestic debt was borrowed under El-Rufai. The state\u2019s domestic debt rose from N16.68 billion in 2014 to N87.2 billion in June 2023. External debt rose from $226.3 million to $569.3 million under El-Rufai\u2019s administration, thus 58.8%\u00a0 of the state\u2019s external debt. Full Text Nigeria\u2019s current debt profile has been a major concern for the government and its citizens. The country relies on crude oil sales for government revenue to fund critical infrastructures as well as pay salaries.\u00a0The reduction in oil production from crude oil theft and the importation of refined oil products have limited what the government earns from the product. The consequent borrowing from international and local institutions by the federal and state governments to fulfil their responsibilities to the citizenry has brought challenges as the government uses a large chunk of finances to pay debt. While the government continues to pay its debt with the revenue it is generating, it is left with a quagmire regarding how to pay its workers and fund projects key to the welfare of its people. This concern was the reason Uba Sani, Governor of Kaduna State, lamented his administration’s inability to pay workers’ salaries during a town hall meeting on March 30, 2024. He blamed it on the huge debts inherited from his predecessor, Nasir El-Rufai. He stated that the state has a huge debt burden of $587 million, N85 billion and 115 contractual liabilities from his predecessor. The governor’s comment stirred debate on X. It pitted him, Uba Sani, against the supporters of El-Rufai, who viewed his complaint as betrayal.\u00a0 It was in the midst of the debate that (@IU_Wakilii) Imran Wakili tweeted:\u00a0 \u201cTo Uba Sani and his new friends. Firstly, before I start, I would like to point out that 45% of the debt in question wasn\u2019t acquired by the El-Rufai administration, as you are trying so hard to make it look. Secondly, your administration is not creative at all, sir. Your administration doesn\u2019t have a plan on how to boost IGR or create wealth for Kaduna State. Lagos is the most indebted state in Nigeria, but because they create wealth, you don\u2019t see them complaining about debt.\u201d \u201cIf you continued on the same trajectory as Mallam Nasir El-Rufai, Kaduna would’ve been generating almost 10 billion naira monthly by now, and you wouldn\u2019t be complaining about debt. But, sir, your administration is too focused on politics and impressing political stakeholders; that’s why you can\u2019t do anything,\u201d he added. DUBAWA decided to investigate this claim because of its potential to misinform. Verification  A check on the website of Nigeria\u2019s Debt Management Office showed that Kaduna state\u2019s domestic debt was N16.6 billion in 2014, a year before El-Rufai was elected. Still, it rose to N87.2 billion as of June 2023, a month after he left. Also, the state\u2019s external debt was $234.4 million in 2014 but rose to $569.3 million in June 2023. Analysing the Debt Management Office\u2019s debt data, $234.4 million was deducted from $569.3 million. It gave the answer as $334.9 million, the sum borrowed under El-Rufai. Another calculation showed that $334.9 million makes up 58.8 per cent of the state’s debt. Calculations showed that the domestic borrowing debt under El-Rufai was N70.5 billion, which makes up 80.8 per cent of the state’s debt. This is because the debt was\u00a0 N16.6 billion in 2014, a year before El-Rufai was elected, and it rose to N87.2 billion when he left. Analysis showed that domestic debt was 423% while external debt rose by 159%. Expert Opinion A financial expert and senior partner at SPM Professionals, Paul Alaje, said the primary reason Kaduna State\u2019s debt profile bludgeoned under El-Rufai was the $350 million World Bank loan he borrowed in 2019 for infrastructure development. \u201cThe loan, which was first rejected by the senate, led to controversy due to the huge amount. I believe he also replicated this in the domestic borrowings because there was a time he spoke in the news that his predecessor will take over N85 billion debt from him.\u201d On whether interest rate could influence the high rise of debt under El-Rufai, he said: \u201cYes, it is possible, but he would have paid a substantial amount of it since his tenure saw an improved collection of Internal Generated Revenue (IGR). So I don\u2019t think the interest rate affected the State\u2019s debt to accrue to the N87 billion he left,\u201d he said. Conclusion The claim that 45 per cent of Kaduna State debt was borrowed before El-Rufai was elected is false. This report is produced for the DUBAWA 2024 Kwame Karikari Fact-Checking Fellowship in partnership with Daily Trust Newspaper to facilitate the ethos of truth in journalism and enhance media literacy in Nigeria.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":18379,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"hannibal_claim_source":"","hannibal_source_label":"","hannibal_card_color":"blue","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","_wpscppro_dont_share_socialmedia":false,"_wpscppro_custom_social_share_image":0,"_facebook_share_type":"","_twitter_share_type":"","_linkedin_share_type":"","_pinterest_share_type":"","_linkedin_share_type_page":"","_instagram_share_type":"","_medium_share_type":"","_threads_share_type":"","_google_business_share_type":"","_bluesky_share_type":"","_mastodon_share_type":"","_selected_social_profile":[],"_wpsp_enable_custom_social_template":false,"_wpsp_social_scheduling":{"enabled":false,"datetime":null,"platforms":[],"status":"template_only","dateOption":"today","timeOption":"now","customDays":"","customHours":"","customDate":"","customTime":"","schedulingType":"absolute"},"_wpsp_active_default_template":true},"categories":[1571,3812,3815,16],"tags":[],"verdict":[],"ppma_author":[4129],"class_list":["post-18378","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-fact-check","category-headline","category-homepage","category-politics"],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8R6dE-4Mq","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"authors":[{"term_id":4129,"user_id":0,"is_guest":1,"slug":"faruk-shuaibu","display_name":"Faruk Shuaibu","avatar_url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/?s=96&r=g","author_category":"","user_url":"","last_name":"","first_name":"","job_title":"","description":""}],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/dubawa.org\/dir\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/El-Rufai.png?fit=1037%2C631&ssl=1","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dubawa.org\/dir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18378","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dubawa.org\/dir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dubawa.org\/dir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dubawa.org\/dir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dubawa.org\/dir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18378"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/dubawa.org\/dir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18378\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18380,"href":"https:\/\/dubawa.org\/dir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18378\/revisions\/18380"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dubawa.org\/dir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/18379"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dubawa.org\/dir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18378"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dubawa.org\/dir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18378"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dubawa.org\/dir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18378"},{"taxonomy":"verdict","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dubawa.org\/dir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/verdict?post=18378"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dubawa.org\/dir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ppma_author?post=18378"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}