{"id":6181,"date":"2020-09-28T08:00:08","date_gmt":"2020-09-28T07:00:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dubawa.org\/dir\/?p=6181"},"modified":"2020-10-12T21:23:34","modified_gmt":"2020-10-12T20:23:34","slug":"impact-of-fact-checking-training-on-the-nigerian-journalists-to-mitigate-the-spread-of-mis-disinformation-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dubawa.org\/dir\/impact-of-fact-checking-training-on-the-nigerian-journalists-to-mitigate-the-spread-of-mis-disinformation-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Impact of Fact-Checking Training on the Nigerian Journalists to mitigate the spread of mis\/disinformation"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

By Raji Rasaki<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A study by Cheruiyot et al. (2018) observes that literature on fact-checking in Africa is largely scarce and recommends that \u201cfuture studies may explore data-driven practices in African journalistic cultures and their implication to legacy news media.\u201d To this end, we published a research paper that investigates the symbiotic relationship between legacy and new media, and the resultant effect of their fact-checking practices in reducing the spread of various forms of information disorder.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fact-checking Journalism<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Scholars have viewed fact-checking through the lens of traditional fact-checking and modern fact-checking. Traditional fact-checking started in the 1920\u2019s and 30\u2019s with leading newsrooms such as Times Magazine, New Yorker, and Newsweek (Fabry, 2017). With what it used to do, traditional practice was more labour-intensive as the newsroom had to hire personnel who tracked possible errors in the news materials before going to press. Fact-checking of this nature was carried out by rewrite desks \u201cmanned by senior reporters and sub-editors whose major duty was to ensure that information supplied was verified and corrected before publishing\u201d (Arogundade, 2019). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

While traditional fact-checking strives to ensure that inaccurate information does not get to the public through the media reports, modern fact-checking does its work by tracking false information already in the public space, scrutinising the veracity of the claims and rating them true or false. It refers to a kind of journalism in which claims by public personalities are researched and judged as false or true, often by journalists designated as \u2018fact checkers (Bob Wekesa et. al, 2017). So, while fact-checking has been part of journalistic practice for  long, modern fact-checking made its way to the current status through digital evolution. Two events gave rise to the full scale political fact-checking practice in the United States: One, the deceptive ads that characterised the 1988 Presidential election and the unchallenged claims that greeted the Iraqi War in the 2000s (Fabry (2017). With the aid of the internet, journalists and fact-checkers felt the need to scrutinise political claims which have hitherto gone unchallenged. Amazeen (2013) reported how journalists in the United States felt non-responsible for reporting information verbatim without verifying the truth and accuracy of such claims. Bill Adair of the Politifact was quoted as saying  \u201cThe reason we created PolitiFact was because of my guilt that I had just been passing along factual claims without verifying their accuracy.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n

In essence, fact-checking has come to make journalism more responsible to its core mandate of informing the public truthfully and accurately so that people can make reasonable choices in the affairs that concern them. This is where fact-checking and social responsibilities of the media are intertwined. This study is convinced of the ripple effects the relationship between the media and fact-checking organisations engender. Having observed that, it is important to examine how fact-checking is helping media fulfil its social responsibilities.   <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Social responsibilities of the media<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

This study relies on the social responsibility theory of the media as its conceptual framework to answer its research questions. Historically, social responsibility theory was developed in 1956 by a group of scholars: Fred Peterson, Theodore Siebert, and Wilbur Schramm (Nwokoro (2019) and Oriola (2019) because there was suspicion around the role of the press and the state actors\u2019 manipulation of the media regarding the publication of propaganda in World War 2 and its capacity to have both good and bad influence on society. Sequel to this suspicion, a Commission on Freedom of the Press was set up in the 1940\u2019s \u201cto inquire into the proper function of the media in modern democracies\u201d (Annamarie, 2017, quoting Nerone, 1995).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Read more<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Fact checks of the week<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n