• Impact of Fact-Checking Training on the Nigerian Journalists to mitigate the spread of mis/disinformation

    By Raji Rasaki

    A study by Cheruiyot et al. (2018) observes that literature on fact-checking in Africa is largely scarce and recommends that “future studies may explore data-driven practices in African journalistic cultures and their implication to legacy news media.” To this end, we published a research paper that investigates the symbiotic relationship between legacy and new media, and the resultant effect of their fact-checking practices in reducing the spread of various forms of information disorder.

    Fact-checking Journalism

    Scholars have viewed fact-checking through the lens of traditional fact-checking and modern fact-checking. Traditional fact-checking started in the 1920’s and 30’s with leading newsrooms such as Times Magazine, New Yorker, and Newsweek (Fabry, 2017). With what it used to do, traditional practice was more labour-intensive as the newsroom had to hire personnel who tracked possible errors in the news materials before going to press. Fact-checking of this nature was carried out by rewrite desks “manned by senior reporters and sub-editors whose major duty was to ensure that information supplied was verified and corrected before publishing” (Arogundade, 2019). 

    While traditional fact-checking strives to ensure that inaccurate information does not get to the public through the media reports, modern fact-checking does its work by tracking false information already in the public space, scrutinising the veracity of the claims and rating them true or false. It refers to a kind of journalism in which claims by public personalities are researched and judged as false or true, often by journalists designated as ‘fact checkers (Bob Wekesa et. al, 2017). So, while fact-checking has been part of journalistic practice for  long, modern fact-checking made its way to the current status through digital evolution. Two events gave rise to the full scale political fact-checking practice in the United States: One, the deceptive ads that characterised the 1988 Presidential election and the unchallenged claims that greeted the Iraqi War in the 2000s (Fabry (2017). With the aid of the internet, journalists and fact-checkers felt the need to scrutinise political claims which have hitherto gone unchallenged. Amazeen (2013) reported how journalists in the United States felt non-responsible for reporting information verbatim without verifying the truth and accuracy of such claims. Bill Adair of the Politifact was quoted as saying  “The reason we created PolitiFact was because of my guilt that I had just been passing along factual claims without verifying their accuracy.” 

    In essence, fact-checking has come to make journalism more responsible to its core mandate of informing the public truthfully and accurately so that people can make reasonable choices in the affairs that concern them. This is where fact-checking and social responsibilities of the media are intertwined. This study is convinced of the ripple effects the relationship between the media and fact-checking organisations engender. Having observed that, it is important to examine how fact-checking is helping media fulfil its social responsibilities.   

    Social responsibilities of the media

    This study relies on the social responsibility theory of the media as its conceptual framework to answer its research questions. Historically, social responsibility theory was developed in 1956 by a group of scholars: Fred Peterson, Theodore Siebert, and Wilbur Schramm (Nwokoro (2019) and Oriola (2019) because there was suspicion around the role of the press and the state actors’ manipulation of the media regarding the publication of propaganda in World War 2 and its capacity to have both good and bad influence on society. Sequel to this suspicion, a Commission on Freedom of the Press was set up in the 1940’s “to inquire into the proper function of the media in modern democracies” (Annamarie, 2017, quoting Nerone, 1995).

    Read more

    Fact checks of the week

    In a viral video shared by a user on Twitter and other social media platforms, the gruesome killing of a woman is recorded and it is claimed that the killing was conducted by Nigerian…

    Amidst the global oil crisis, a social media user claims that Akwa Abasi Ibom kingdom is listed on Wikipedia as the fifth “highest” producer of oil and gas in Africa. Our findings show…

    As education swiftly moves online, a widely circulated message on Facebook and WhatsApp state that the famous Oxford University Press has made all of their Caribbean Secondary Education Certificate (CSEC) and Caribbean Advanced Proficiency Examination (CAPE) books free for online reading. But how true is this and what is the implication on publishing?


    • Did the Nigerian Government ban sachet alcohol?

    Not true. While the goal of the Agency is to completely phase out the consumption and production of sachet and glass bottle alcohol, NAFDAC has not placed a ban on these items. The headline of the story by Punch is misleading, Dubawa concluded. (Continue reading here).

    What can you do? 

    Be alert, share our tips and don’t share false news! 

    Coronavirus infection count 

    Note: Total cases may be more than officially stated owing to the inability to include unconfirmed cases. Stay safe!

    Tip of the week 

    #FakeNews Alert 

    The claim that the government has approved the sum of N25,000 to be given to Nigeria households is most likely to be false. Why? With the advent of the new coronavirus and the ‘stay at home’ order, the social media has been receiving links, with varied amounts, claiming the federal government is giving out cash to Nigerian households. Dubawa has also fact-checked some of these links and they all turned out to be false. To this end, make sure to verify before sharing or better still, leave it be.

    This report by the Herald was traced to a September 24th post by The Punch. The report claimed Pastor Ize Iyamu who contested under the All Progressive Congress during the just concluded Edo2020 Elections appealed to Godwin Obaseki who won the election under the People’s Democratic Party to return to APC. The report had no byline, was attributed to a Live Broadcast aired on an undisclosed channel or frequency and has been deleted from Punch’s website. The Herald who also published the claim has failed to state where the pastor made the appeal which leaves the report sketchy.

    Other Fact-checks 

  • Are Classrooms Filled With Cows in UNIJOS? #NO

    A not-so popular news media organisation, ScanNews, is on Facebook claiming that senior citizens (cows) have taken over the classrooms of the University of Jos.

    The post on ScanNews via Facebook reads: “This is University of Jos where senior citizens attend classes instead of students.” A picture showing a herd of cows inside a classroom accompany the post.
    However, the school management of UNIJOS have denied the allegation.


    Ordinarily, the term “senior citizens” refer to the aged, retirees or pensioners; people who have attained a certain age on earth. In Nigeria and with reference to the recent happenings, a particular family of animals are referred to as “senior citizens”. They are COWS!


    The attention of management of the University of Jos has been drawn to the post which shows cows in a classroom in the University of Jos. Abdullahi Abdullahi, Principal Assistant Registrar (Information and Publications) of the University of Jos who spoke on behalf of the school management said in a few words “the post is not true. It is just lies”.


    The incident which was posted on July 23 has been refuted by students of the University of Jos. Enoga Aje Oitu, a 400 level student of History and International Studies said “it is a lie please. I was in school that very day around 10am and I left by 1:30pm and I didn’t see cows in any classroom or heard about it”.

    Uche Francis Emmanuel, a 400 level student of Accounting said “I was in school from 7am to 11:30am. Though I saw some cows grazing in the school premises that very day, the issue of cows in the classroom is not true”.


    A genuine picture speaks a thousand words but a fake picture creates confusion and a frenzied atmosphere. Our research team, using Google Reverse Image Search, discovered that the picture was taken in 2017 and used to narrate an incident that occurred in Edo state.

    The story behind the photo, which was reported by various news agencies, alleges that cows invaded Ohovbe Primary school in Ikpoba-Okha Local Government Area of Edo state. The cows disrupted classes and generally sacked pupils and teachers. It was gathered then that the herdsmen have turned the school to a grazing ground and the cows hide inside the classrooms whenever it rains.


    The post is FALSE both in words and in picture! The classrooms at the University of Jos have not been overturned by cows. Although cows were in classrooms in Edo in 2017, cows have not been sighted in the classrooms of the University of Jos as the post alleges.

Back to top button